About China: "Canadians need to talk about what's happening under our noses."
Ten years after Beijing insinuated itself into the World Trade Organization, Chinese corporate monopolies and crony-capitalist empires still enjoy protectionist tariffs and anti-competition laws that have rendered the whole idea of liberalized global trade a sick joke. The racket has engorged Chinese industrial barons with the booty of a sixfold increase in Chinese exports that have cost millions of North American workers their jobs and transformed what was an already fraudulent "socialism with Chinese characteristics" into an increasingly vile regime.
Fully half of China's billion citizens subsist on sub-Saharan incomes of less than $2 a day, and they're growing increasingly impatient with the corruption, oppression and persecution that has accompanied the stuffing of Beijing's foreign-reserves treasury.
But the dozens of unelected billionaires who now dominate the People's Congress that pretends to be a parliament have decided they will not put up with backchat from Chinese patriots and essayists or with "mass incidents" of the kind that broke out in Wukan and Haimen. Over the past five years, Congress deputies have doubled military spending, adding to a vast and growing security, surveillance and prisoncomplex apparatus with an annual budget that now hovers in the neighbourhood of $200 billion.
By all the evidence, this suits Canada's Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade just fine.
The situation is more dire than you might think. None other than Anthony Campbell, former head of the Intelligence Assessment Secretariat in the PCO during the 1990s, has this to say about my column: "The servility of Canada's political leaders (municipal, provincial and federal) to the obvious manipulations of Chinese strategists who flaunt world trade and financial market principles and jail democracy-promoting authors for 10-year terms is a national disgrace.Canada is not a parking lot for Chinese (or American) resources and our complicity with what Glavin rightly describes as "a rigged game" orchestrated by this "increasingly vile regime" in Beijing needs to end. Canadians need to talk about what's happening under our noses and Glavin's piece is a very good starting point."
The column is indeed just a starting point. Stay tuned. It will make the hairs stand up on the back of your neck. We may start with this. We'll see.
Here's an informed view of how the Year of the Dragon will unfold:
Money started to leave the country in October and Beijing's foreign reserves have been shrinking since September. . . there were 280,000 "mass incidents" last year according to one count -- but that they are also increasingly violent as the recent wave of uprisings, insurrections, rampages and bombings suggest. The Communist Party, unable to mediate social discontent, has chosen to step-up repression to levels not seen in two decades. The authorities have, for instance, blanketed the country's cities and villages with police and armed troops and stepped up monitoring of virtually all forms of communication and the media. It's no wonder that, in online surveys, "control" and "restrict" were voted the country's most popular words for 2011. . . the Chinese government could dissolve like the autocracies in Tunisia and Egypt."
Keep an eye on my pal Mark Collins at the Canadian Defence & Foreign Affairs' Institute's 3D blog. You'll thank me later. Meantime, below is the Chinese human rights activist Ni Yulan, showing up in court after being beaten by police. The trial began with Ni lying on a cot in the courtroom, relying on an oxygen machine. She faces charges of "picking quarrels and making trouble."
6 Comments:
Terry -
Aoarently the establishment Liberals at the Ottawa Citizen have already purged your column -- the link is no longer there. Is there a way you could attatch a copy of your column, from your files, on your blog? I would love to read it.
-- David Murrell in Fredericton, NB
"Establishment Liberals"? Good Lord.
Try again. The link works fine.
Yes your column is back up now, after being down all day yesterday (Friday). And your column emphasizes it is not just the Liberal party but also the Conservative government that preaches pro-Chinese lapog diplomacy.
I get much of my international news from the CBC and the Globe and Mail. We can all agree that both long have been pro-Liberal party institutions. The Harper administration at first, from 2006-2008, criticized Chinese repression of dissidents, but came under withering fire from both the CBC and the Globe.
I recall Jeffrey Simpson and Lawrence Martin, both Liberal party supporters, devoting many columns attacking Harper and defending China. I submitted three short, pithy letters-to-the-editor protesting the pro-China stance at the Globe -- but all three were rejected. The Globe dislikes different points of view on its editorial pages. There is very little pro-human rights advocacy, at the Globe, of any kind.
The result? Harper 's Conservatives have backtracked, and now support close ties with China. Yes, you're right. Lot's of good info in your column. Note that CIDA still gives aid to China. And I note that there is very little reporting of Chinese repression in Canada, both from the Liberal CBC, G&M and CP press, but also from the pro-Conservative media. I do not know how to repsond to this problem.
C'mon Terry, Canadians aren't going to give a flying foo-foo about China or the Chinese.
Cubans live on a couple of dollars a day, live under a brutal military dictatorship, without any freedoms, live like slaves and yet every year tens of thousands of good Canadians happily go there for all inclusive vacations that makes the junta richer and does nothing for ordinary Cubans.
Even worse, the morally corrupt NDP used to until recently run annual young dipper trips to Cuba where they were treated to Potemkin village propaganda about how idyllic life was for Cubans under the Castro Communists.
If Canadians participate gleefully in supporting a mass murdering communist dictatorship close to home, how do you think we will get morally righteous about some far away Chines peasant taking a dump in his rice paddy?
Fred: If you think I'm making an appeal to anyone's sense of moral righteousness, you might want to notice that point, which I made in my column, that such appeals are as likely to fall on NDP ears that are no more deaf than Conservative or Liberal ears in this matter.
Terry,
Thanks for the kind words and a very happy and progressive re China new year!
dmurrell: See this of mine on the Globe and China from 2006:
"China and the Conservatives: Internal war at the Globe and Mail"
Plus:
"So, do we want censorship?"
Mark
Ottawa
Post a Comment
<< Home